Investment Institute
Asset Class

How understanding the corporate lifecycle can offer valuable investment insights

Key Points

Companies pass through various lifecycle stages, each with their own characteristics
These stages present different potential risks and opportunities for investors
Assessing a company lifecycle can help investors diversify portfolios and select stocks

Our preferences, mindset, and energy are shaped by the stage we are at in life, driven by underlying characteristics tied to age, experience, and development. It seems natural that a teenager would have a vastly different perspective to someone in their late 40s — the same can also be said of the corporate world.

Companies, as well as people, pass through recognisable lifecycle stages — from scrappy, loss-making upstarts to high-growth disruptors, mature cash-generators, and eventually, in some cases, declining legacy players. Each stage comes with its own set of fundamentals, risks, and opportunities. The key difference? Unlike humans, companies can reinvent themselves. They can prolong youth, reverse decline, or stagnate unexpectedly.

Understanding what stage a company is at in its lifecycle can be very useful in making investment decisions. Quantitative analysis seeks to model behaviour that is both structured and widely observable — lifecycle stages offer exactly that, providing a rich seam of potential, actionable insights for investors.

We believe lifecycle-based classification can reveal meaningful patterns in company fundamentals and improve how we interpret risk, growth potential, and ultimately, returns. It can be a powerful lens to complement both fundamental and quantitative investing.


Lifecycle stages and characteristics

Traditional investment frameworks often overlook the importance of lifecycle dynamics. Most factor investing models evaluate companies based on size, value, growth or momentum – ignoring where a company stands in its natural evolution. For example, two firms with identical profit margins might be fundamentally different if one is scaling up while the other is in structural decline. Understanding where they are in their lifecycle can potentially highlight missing, different, or more nuanced information. 

Below, we explain the stages of a company lifecycle, as well as the typical characteristics and profile of a company in each of these stages.

Companies in the Transitory stage are characterised by early experimentation with their product or business models,  an unclear strategy and inconsistent revenues. Outcomes are highly uncertain, and these companies are typically very early-stage and not always profitable.

The Loss Maker stage includes companies that are consistently unprofitable and lack sustainable earnings. This situation may arise due to mismanagement, decline, or external shocks. Both early-stage startups and mature companies facing structural or operational issues can fall into this category.

Moving into Emerging Profitable Growth, companies have achieved profitability and experience rapid revenue growth with expanding margins. Their focus is on reinvestment, and they operate efficiently and with agility. These are generally young, fast-scaling companies showing strong operational momentum.

The Mature Growth stage features companies with an established market presence, stable revenues, and consistent cash flows. Despite their stability, they continue to reinvest significantly to support expansion. These are typically larger, well-positioned companies that are still experiencing growth.

In the Mature Stable stage, companies hold a strong market position with steady revenues and cash flows. Their primary focus shifts toward capital return strategies such as dividends and buybacks, prioritising shareholder value over aggressive growth.

Finally, the Decline stage involves companies facing shrinking revenues and margins, often losing their competitive edge. They tend to cut costs, sell assets, and reduce capital investment. Without reinvention, these companies risk obsolescence and long-term performance issues, often due to structural disruptions or outdated business models.

Companies are not bound to move linearly through lifecycle stages — they can reinvent themselves. It’s entirely possible for a firm in the Decline or Mature Stable stage to transition back into Emerging Profitable Growth. However, such a reversal typically requires meaningful innovation, a refreshed product line-up, and structural changes to reinvigorate a stagnating business model. We’ve observed several compelling examples of this kind of turnaround in practice; below is a series of charts showing how we classify the lifecycle stages of various large corporates over time, according to the framework above.

Figure 1: Lifecycle classifications of Netflix over time
Source: AXA IM
Figure 2: Lifecycle transitions of Oracle over time
Source: AXA IM
Figure 3: Lifecycle transitions of Meta Platforms over time
Source: AXA IM
Figure 4: Lifecycle transitions of Exxon Mobil over time
Source: AXA IM

Valuable insights for investors

Figure 5: Average annualised excess returns at each lifecycle stage
Source: AXA IM

Figure 5 shows average annualised excess returns associated with companies in each lifecycle stage relative to companies in the investment universe (North America and Europe, Middle East and Africa developed stocks excluding microcaps).

Companies in the Mature Stable and Mature Growth stages exhibit similar return profiles, whereas those in Emerging Profitable Growth slightly underperform the overall universe. This table also indicates that exposure to the Mature Stable and Mature Growth segments can potentially offer allocation advantages.

Taking a factor-driven investment approach, we analyse the performance of the top quintile of each factor within each lifecycle stage relative to other companies in the same stage (see Figure 6).

Figure 6: Average annualised excess returns according to lifecycle stage
Source: AXA IM

Our data indicates that stocks classed as Value - those which appear to be trading for less than their underlying worth - have seen the highest average excess returns among those in the Mature Stable stage of the lifecycle. However, Mature Growth companies have historically been more effectively selected based on momentum rather than quality.1

The Momentum and Quality factors – respectively stocks which have had a positive price change relative to the market over the last 12 months and those with more consistent earnings growth and typically less volatility - are particularly well-suited for selecting companies in the Declining and Emerging Profitable Growth stages. As seen earlier in Figure 5, the Emerging Profitable Growth segment exhibits slightly negative excess returns; however, through stock selection using Momentum and Quality factors, this segment has delivered the highest factor premia.

For these reasons, we believe that classifying companies according to their lifecycle stages offers valuable insights for investors. By understanding the unique characteristics and dynamics of each stage, investors can aim to enhance portfolio diversification, potentially improve risk management, and use these classifications as contextual frameworks in stock selection models.
 


1 Past performance does not guarantee future returns

    Disclaimer

    The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (AXA IM) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.

    This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA IM in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.

    AXA IM excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA IM is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA IM is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.

    The information on the website of AXA IM does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.

    Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.

    AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd.