Disparate impact: Why are European equities underperforming?
It has been taken as given that the Iran war has been economically worse for Europe than for the US, as the former is an energy importer while the latter is an exporter.
From a GDP point of view, this is certainly the case. Net exports should improve for the US and deteriorate for Europe.
But the effect on business activity and consumer demand is not necessarily different. It does not matter to a business or an individual whether the now more expensive energy was imported or produced domestically.
The price increase for Brent oil (the benchmark for Europe) has indeed been greater than that for West Texas Intermediate (the US benchmark), but not dramatically so. The Brent ‘premium’ - how much Brent oil prices have increased compared to WTI - has averaged just 7% over the last two months, though for a few days it topped 20% (see Exhibit 1).
However, this premium does not seem to be sufficient to cause a significantly greater weakening of the European economy. In fact, one could argue the impact of higher energy prices could be greater on the US.
The average US motorist drives around twice the number of kilometres per year than a European driver.1 In addition, transportation costs represent a higher share of service sector costs in the US than in Europe, due to the greater physical size of the market. On the other hand, manufacturing represents a larger share of the economy (15%) in Europe than it does in the US (10%).
Regardless of what one might believe should be the impact, Purchasing Managers’ Indices show that the European economy is weakening more than the US.
While some manufacturing sector PMIs somewhat surprisingly improved in March and April (partly due to higher supplier delivery times, which is interpreted as positive in the index calculation as it may indicate high demand), the flash figures for May dropped into contractionary territory for Germany and France, while the PMI improved in the US (see Exhibit 2).
The services sector’s deterioration was immediate and more dramatic, though the impact of higher energy prices on services should be less than for manufacturing.
European PMIs have fallen an average of five points and all the readings are below 50, indicating contraction. In the US, there has been a deterioration of less than two points and the PMIs remain in expansionary territory.
The final arbiter as far as equity investors are concerned is the market itself - and it has delivered a similar judgement. Since 27 February, European equities have underperformed US value stocks, using the Russell 1000 Value index instead of the S&P 500 to measure the performance of the US market in order to make an ‘apples to apples’ comparison as far as sector composition is concerned.
The S&P 500 has outperformed the Russell index, but this reflects the recent global outperformance of technology shares, which make up only a small part of the MSCI Europe index.
Despite the recovery in equity markets since the end of March, the MSCI Europe’s return since the start of the war is still negative while the Russell Value is more than 5% higher (see Exhibit 3).
- {https://frontiergroup.org/resources/fact-file-americans-drive-most/ Frontier Group, February 2022}
European equities’ underperformance is nothing new - but blaming it on the Iran war may be a mistake. The structural challenges the region faces, and the arguably greater dynamism of US companies, is a more likely explanation.
A better option for investors looking for exposure to the region may be to focus on industries which will potentially benefit from initiatives to support Europe’s sovereign ambitions - to protect its interests without relying on other states.
This approach addresses deficiencies in the defence sector but also looks to boost capabilities in healthcare and energy resilience, for example.
The potential investment opportunity is clear as investors can effectively monetise government spending as funding from policies to support this goal goes primarily to companies. The offsetting factor may be higher government bond yields if debt turns out to be the primary source of the additional funding.
Performance data sources: FactSet, BNP Paribas Asset Management as of 28 May 2026 (unless otherwise stated). Past performance should not be seen as a guide to future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for investors domiciled in Switzerland.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) is not liable for unauthorised use of the website.
This website is for advertising and informational purpose only. The published information and expression of opinions are provided for personal use only. The information, data, figures, opinions, statements, analyses, forecasts, simulations, concepts and other data provided by AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) in this document are based on our knowledge and experience at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) excludes any warranty (explicit or implicit) for the accuracy, completeness and up-to-dateness of the published information and expressions of opinion. In particular, AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) is not obliged to remove information that is no longer up to date or to expressly mark it a such. To the extent that the data contained in this document originates from third parties, AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, up-to-dateness and appropriateness of such data, even if only such data is used that is deemed to be reliable.
The information on the website of AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group) does not constitute a decision aid for economic, legal, tax or other advisory questions, nor may investment or other decisions be made solely on the basis of this information. Before any investment decision is made, detailed advice should be obtained that is geared to the client's situation.
Past performance or returns are neither a guarantee nor an indicator of the future performance or investment returns. The value and return on an investment is not guaranteed. It can rise and fall and investors may even incur a total loss.
AXA Investment Managers Switzerland Ltd (Part of BNP Paribas Group)
__________________________________________________________________________
AXA IM and BNPP AM are progressively merging and streamlining our legal entities to create a unified structure
AXA Investment Managers joined BNP Paribas Group in July 2025. Following the merger of AXA Investment Managers Paris and BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Europe and their respective holding companies on December 31, 2025, the combined company now operates under the BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Europe name.